Town Codes        Town Codes        Search Town Minutes

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

A Tale of Two Extended-Stay Hotels...

For some time I have been curious as to why Fees In Lieu of Mitigation (FILM) agreements no longer come before the town board for their approval. Up until the time the Reed administration sought an opinion on FILM from a Glen Falls attorney, the contracts always came before the board.

Town Law specifically says that all contracts on behalf of the town have to be approved by the town board. So is it a matter of Tyksinski doing whatever the Hell he wants or is it because collecting fees in lieu of mitigation are only legal in New Hartford NY because no developer has ever filed a lawsuit against the town so they are best kept hidden?

At any rate, I decided to FOIL the contracts from some of the latest developments in New Hartford; Townplace Suites off of 840; Homewood Suites in the infamous business park; and Stewart’s Shop on Middlesettlement Road.

That’s when I noticed it…a glaring difference between the contracts signed by the two hotels. It would appear that New Hartford really doesn’t have a fair method of determining what needs to be mitigated or how much it will cost, but rather Tyksinski is in essence playing favorites or perhaps something worse.

Take for instance the Townplace Suites off Route 840 built by New Hartford Lodging out of Corning, NY.

Here is the description according to town Planning Board agenda dated September 2014:
Townplace Suites Preliminary Site Plan Review of a proposed hotel on Middle Settlement Road, New Hartford, New York. Tax Map #316.016­6­64.2; Zoning: C1 General Commercial. Proposed 98 units on Middle Settlement Road at NYS Route 840 West ramp.


Then, there is the proposal put forth to the Planning Board in May 2015 by Larry Adler:
Homewood Suites Mr. Larry Adler/New Hartford Office Group: Preliminary Site Plan Review for a proposed 4­story, 85 room hotel and a restaurant of approximately 3000 square feet on Woods Park Drive, New Hartford, New York. Tax Map #328.000­3­7.1; Lot Size: Approximately 4 Acres. Zoning: C1 General Commercial.


Notice, both are 4 story buildings; one for 98 units and the other for 85 units (plus Mr. Adler's proposal also includes a restaurant on a separate parcel); both are located almost across from each other off of Rte. 840; and both are for extended-stay hotels.

I put together a spreadsheet of the FILM monies collected from each of the developers according to the FILM contracts each signed:

(Click here for a larger pdf view!)

It is quite easy to see that Mr. Adler paid far less for mitigation (...of something apparently yet to be determined) than the Townplace Suites across the way.

How does the town justify charging mitigation fees without identifying the possible problem that might need mitigating? Also, it is interesting to note the difference in fees for the two (2) hotels given proximity and the similarities of the two projects.

Mr. Adler's contract notes that, in addition to the $13,123.20 of fees collected, credit has been given to Mr. Adler because he has agreed to provide lighting along the entry/exit to Woods Park Drive from Rte. 840. Whoopie Doo!

No indication of how many light; when (a year later there is no sign of any lighting being installed); who is going to pay to keep the lights on (taxpayers?); or for that matter if they will even be lit. Just that he is going to place an undetermined number of lights along the road into his project therefore, he has been given credit and does not need to pay the customary fees other developers have to pay.

Problem is, other than a cut-through to Seneca Turnpike, Woods Park Drive only leads directly to his business park! More importantly, it is also a town-owned road built with taxpayer dollars.

Town Law Section 64 clearly states that the "management, custody and control of all town lands, buildings and property of the town" is placed squarely in the hands of the town board. Without town board action, Mr. Adler doesn’t have any business placing lights on Woods Park Drive without the issue coming before the town board.

Further what is he mitigating? Seriously…making it easier to drive to his own business park? Really? Actually, since when did lighting become a mitigating factor identified in the GEIS as requiring the payment of mitigation fees?

Here is something else that I find interesting. Tyksinski's signature on Mr Adler’s agreement was notarized by the town attorney, Attorney Cully. The other two agreements that I FOILed were signed by the town clerk and the village clerk. Why is the town attorney involved in agreements that clearly should have been presented for town board approval? Is there some kind of backroom deal going on here?

According to Town Law, these three (3) contracts and any other FILM contracts that have been signed during Tyksinski's reign are null and void.

Here are pdfs of the two (2) hotel FILM contracts I received through FOIL.


2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Didn't Larry Adler give big donations to Tyksinski last election?

Connect the dots. Was it just a payoff at election time or is there ... "more" to the story?

Anonymous said...

Tada. Your blog is read, but nobody else comments? The apathy is appalling.

Don't worry, I sent a copy of this to the NY AG. Either he is apathetic also or will finally have to look into things at Bunker Hall.