Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Hmmm....



A recent article in the Observer Dispatch...New Hartford considering own sewage plant.

The article quotes Supervisor Tyksinski:
“I believe it’s my obligation, and I believe the town is looking to me and the board to say what’s best for the town, not the sewer district,” Tyksinski said.
In recent months, Steve Devan and former Highway Superintendent Roger Cleveland have attended town board meetings and when questioned have said they have no idea how much it will eventually cost each sewer user; what fixes will be done first; and how they plan to make sure that no one pays more than their fair share. Supervisor Tyksinski has publicly stated at those meetings that he fears that the town will end up paying more than it's fair share of the costs to satisfy the D.E.C. Consent Order and logic tells us that he is probably right.

The problems plaguing the sewer district are not new; they have been debated for years and by all accounts we are no further ahead now than we were then. In fact, some of the same "players" are still in charge which makes it more disheartening that there are still no definite plans on how to fix the problem other than to throw money at it.

While it's commendable that Supervisor Tyksinski is exploring all the options, and while we certainly do not have the expertise to say whether a sewage plant in New Hartford would be feasible or not; there is something that can be done right now to at least make sewer costs equitable to all New Hartford sewer users.

Currently, not all sewer users in the Town of New Hartford are paying the town assessed sewer maintenance fees. As many as 700-800 users either pay nothing or pay only a portion of the cost to maintain the present sewer pump stations and lines. The rest of the sewer users are paying the full amount of the ad valorem and per unit charge maintenance charge on the Town and County tax bills.

This has been brought up at town board meetings several times by Councilman Backman and even reported on by the Observer Dispatch. In fact, there was a resolution that was passed several years ago to correct the situation in one area of town and yet nothing has been done to comply with that resolution.

The Consolidated Sewer District in the Town of New Hartford is a special benefit district and by town law is supposed to be paid for by the people receiving the benefit.

Supervisor Tyksinski, it is also your obligation to see to it that all residents in town are treated fairly. Not one more year should go by with only a portion of the sewer users paying the bulk of the maintenance fees!

Monday, June 28, 2010

Hampton Inn and GEIS

As reported in today's Observer Dispatch article, Hampton Inn gets preliminary OK for New Hartford Business Park, the Planning Board gave their approval for the plans as presented this evening; however, there are some issues that still need to be addressed by the Planning Board according to Codes Enforcement Officer Joe Booth. It was noted tonight that under Planned Development Park zoning, the Planning Board has the option of granting a waiver.

One item that was discussed tonight never did make it to the agenda that was posted on the town website several days ago or the agenda that was available at the meeting tonight.

Given the fact that Planning Board Chairman Elis DeLia and Town Attorney Herb Cully were well prepared to address the issue tonight it is doubtful that the item was added to the agenda at the last minute. More than likely it was intentionally left off the agenda to keep those who have been strongly opposing the GEIS from attending tonight's meeting. Planning Board Chairman Elis DeLia has already made it quite clear that there will be no public comment periods at Planning Board meetings.

Board Chairman DeLia was definitely pushing the Planning Board to approve the findings of the GEIS for the Southern Area of town; however, two board members were reluctant because copies of the findings were never made available to the board. It was finally decided that the discussion will resume at the next Planning Board meeting.

Here is the excerpt of tonight's meeting regarding the GEIS:



Getting back to the article in today's Observer Dispatch regarding the Hampton Inn, Larry Adler was quoted as saying:
Adler said the fact that plans for access to Route 840 were moving forward had helped get the hotel project on track again.

“There is a positive feeling about the potential break in access of 840,” he said.
That's an interesting statement. To date, no mention of the plans for a break in access of 840 has recently been discussed in open meeting. It certainly was not mentioned at tonight's Planning Board meeting.

For those who are interested in the entire Planning Board meeting including the discussion of the preliminary site review of the Hampton Inn in the New Hartford Business Park, the video is below.

Planning Board meeting...

...tonight, June 28, 2010, starting at 5:30 p.m. downstairs in the New Hartford Public Library.

As reported in the Observer Dispatch, Hampton Inn plans move forward, one of the items on the agenda is a conceptual/preliminary site plan review for a Hampton Inn to be constructed at the New Hartford Business Park.

Planning Board agenda is now online!

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Standards of Library Service...

Education Law §254. Standards of library service
The regents shall have power to fix standards of library service for every free association, public and hospital library or, with the advice of the appropriate tribal government and library board of trustees, Indian library which receives any portion of the moneys appropriated by the state to aid such libraries, or which is supported in whole or in part by tax levied by any municipality or district. In the case of a hospital library or a library serving a hospital, such standards shall be established in consultation with the commissioner of health. If any such library shall fail to comply with the regents requirements, such library shall not receive any portion of the moneys appropriated by the state for free, hospital or Indian libraries nor shall any tax be levied by any municipality or district for the support in whole or in part of such library.
What are the Standards of Library Service and how does a library meet those standards?

Standard #1 - Written By-laws
Indeed the library does have written by-laws; however, Ms. DuRoss and others on this library board are choosing to ignore them as far as appointment of library trustees.

It is puzzling why they are being so confrontational; their bylaws seem to be very clear..."The trustees shall be appointed by the New Hartford Town Board." The same message is contained within their charter and on their website. It is becoming more and more apparent that there are things that they don't want the general public to know.

Standard #2 - Every library needs a long-range plan as a formal document.
Concerned Citizens FOILed several documents from the New Hartford Public Library. After a few go-a-rounds with Library Director Hans Plambeck, we were finally provided some of the information we requested.

One of the items we received was the New Hartford Public Library's Service Plan [long-range plan] adopted 11-18-2008. It is all of half a page. This document definitely needs work to fulfill the requirement for Standard #2.

For comparison, take a look at the long-range plans of Jervis Public Library in Rome.
Standard #3 - Report to the Community
They answered our FOIL request by providing:
- a copy of their Summer 2009 and Winter 2009 NHPL News with 2008 data;
- a copy of a document called Program Services dated 11-18-2008
- a report called Present Situation dated 11-12-08
- Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2008
- 2009 Annual Report for Public and Association Libraries.

It was made known at the June 17, 2010 Board of Trustee meeting that the Library has received a letter from the NYS Comptroller regarding the Comptroller's Report that is to be filed each year in accordance with Town Law; the report has never been filed. While the Comptroller's letter was mentioned at the June 17th trustee meeting, no copy was provided.
STANDARD #4: Written Policies
In answer to our FOIL, we were provided with a Meeting Rooms Use Policy dated June 18, 2008 and an Internet policy dated January 21, 1998.

There are many more policies listed on the above "Written Policies" link that were not provided. It would appear that work needs to be done in this area. We were definitely taken back at the June 17th meeting when it was learned that there is apparently no policy for donations of restricted funds and no signed agreements for restricted funds.
Standard #5 - Budget
We were provided with a letter sent to Earle Reed dated September 16, 2009 detailing the Library's 2010 budget request.
Standard #6 - Evaluating Effectiveness
To meet this standard, a library should be able to demonstrate that it queried its community, developed service objectives based on community need and evaluated the results of those objectives.
Standard #7 - Hours
According to Library Standards for our size town, the minimum hours NHPL is required to be open is 40 hours per week. New Hartford Public Library exceeds the required minimum hours.
Standard #8 - Maintaining a Facility to Meet Community Needs

Standard #9 - Equipment


Standard #10 - Printed Information
We were provided with a pamphlet dated 12-17-2009 that gives many details regarding the library including, and we quote:
"The Library is governed by an eleven member Board of Trustees made up of citizens appointed to five year terms by the Town of New Hartford. A list of trustees is available at the Circulation Desk."
Standard #11 - A paid Director

We have FOILed several other documents, but it would appear that not only does the Library not abide by the Open Meetings Law, they also don't like to respond to the Freedom of Information Law. The Library Director, Hans Plambeck, told Mr. Wiatr that he deletes any email messages that are not in reply to a message he sent. Nice way to run a library, eh?

To be continued...

Thursday, June 17, 2010

New Hartford Public Library June Trustee Meeting

Today's Observer Dispatch reported on the June meeting of the New Hartford Library Trustee Meeting...Library board head: Uncertainty remains over Wiatr appointment.

According to the 2010 Adopted Town of New Hartford budget, $475,000 of taxpayer money is going to support the Library.

We thought it important for taxpayers to see how the Library Board of Trustees conducts their meetings so we videotaped and will be videotaping all meetings henceforth.

We welcome your comments on tonight's meeting.

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Meetings this week...

Next town board meeting, Wednesday, June 16, 2010 at Butler Hall. There will be an Executive Session starting at 6:00 p.m. with the regular meeting starting at 7:00 p.m.

Agenda now online!



New Hartford Public Library Board of Trustees Meeting, Thursday, June 17, 2010 starting at 7:00 p.m. in Butler Hall. Public is welcome! For more information call the Library at 733-1535.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

More of the same??

Tyksinski supports Inserra for New Hartford police chief, that's what we read in today's paper.

Normally, this would be a great day...one of our own police officers named as provisional chief and then possibly promoted to Police Chief.

Unfortunately, this announcement and the decision at the May 26th town board meeting that the application deadline was being extended for one additional week both have an odor to them. It actually really didn't dawn on us what was happening until we read some comments on the Observer Dispatch article the day after the town board meeting. We blogged about it a couple of weeks ago.

What makes this announcement troublesome is the fact that Sgt. Inserra did not submit an application until after the deadline for submission of an application had expired. Certainly Sgt. Inserra had plenty of time to make his decision; former Police Chief Philo made known his intentions to retire long before the official announcement that the town board was starting the search for Philo's replacement and long before the deadline for submitting applications. So what reason could there possibly be for Sgt. Inserra to wait until after the deadline and until after three (3) other candidates were interviewed before making his interests known. More troubling is that the town board voted to extend the deadline AFTER interviewing Inserra and BEFORE he even submitted an "official" application.

According to the article:
Tyksinski said the full board met with Inserra in an executive session prior to the May 26 meeting, because they had heard he was interested.
They heard he was interested? Heard from whom? If he was so interested and if he thought he was the best man for the job, why didn't he bother to submit his application like everyone else did? Shouldn't someone who wants to be a police chief be confident enough and organized enough to submit his application on time? What prevented him from doing that?

The article goes on to say:
Asked if the board had reopened the search just for Inserra, Tyksinski said no.

“As far as I’m concerned I wanted to reopen the search anyway, because at that point we only had three viable candidates,” he said. “I didn’t think it was appropriate for us to make a determination with just that.”
Sorry, but that is just not a very believable statement Pat. One week added for other applications? The town received eight applications that were approved by Oneida County's Personnel Department according to a May 20, 2010 article, Three interviewed for NH police chief; only three of the eight were interviewed. A couple of the people supposedly withdrew their application; did the town board interview any of the remaining candidates that were approved by Oneida County after the deadline was extended or was Sgt. Inserra the only one that was interviewed? If the town board merely wanted to expand the search, shouldn't at least one (1) of the other approved applicants who got their application in on time get a chance to interview as well? Sorry, it would appear that the search was opened up to interview one (1) more who was hand-selected by someone.

According to the article:
“Right now, on my own, knowing what I do of Mike and looking at all our other applicants, I would have no problem supporting Mike as our police chief,” Tyksinski said.
The article also says:
Tyksinski also said he had not gotten to know Inserra until he became town supervisor in January.
If that is the case, just how well do you know him...6 months worth? We're not buying it.

Councilman Reynolds was quoted as saying:
Town Board member David Reynolds said he supported Inserra “100 percent.”

“I think he can hit the ground running,” he said. “He is a strong, capable police leader and I think he has a clear understanding of the financial constraints the town is facing.”
Gee Dave, we feel better with your endorsement..who created those financial constraints?

The article continues:
Inserra has been with the New Hartford Police Department for 22 years, and he grew up in New Hartford.

“He knows the town and the community and the Police Department,” Tyksinski said. “He has a lot of experience with regard to writing procedures and policies for our department, he knows all the guys.”
Actually, those would be the exact same reasons why perhaps Sgt. Inserra shouldn't be considered. Do we really want someone who writes the same policies and procedures that Philo did and who is chummy with "the boys"? When FOILed for any complaints against the Police Department and for any emails or other correspondence from the former Police Commissioners, the reply was there are none.

Interesting because as a result of FOILing all of Dave Reynold's emails, we just happen to have an email from Steve Zogby who was in the process of putting together a quote for town insurance back in May 2008. He mentions that he needs more information on two (2) of the claims for law enforcement liability...Tretter and Warmack. We know there have been other claims. For one, Ms. Alessi filed a complaint where she even mentions Sgt. Inserra by name. But the good ol' boys protect each other...the fox guarding the henhouse syndrome.

It would appear that this is a done deal...the timing of the announcement in the paper suggests that Supervisor Tyksinski has a majority vote on the town board; otherwise, he would have held off making a statement. The real story behind this decision [and we do believe there is more to the story] will probably never be known.

The police department is one of the largest expenses of the town budget and Sgt. Inserra was one of the officers receiving beau coup overtime. Since he didn't have the tenacity to put his application in from the get-go, will he be able to rein in a runaway department or will someone else be pulling his strings?

We'd love to hear your comments.

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Holy Smokes Backman!

A story in today's Observer Dispatch article, Should New Hartford redraw its fire districts? focuses on the rising costs of Willowvale Fire Company that serves part of the southern end of town.

Don Backman, councilman for that part of town covered by the Willowvale Fire Company wants to redraw fire district lines. According to Councilman Backman:
“It’s getting pretty expensive,” he said. “We have to look at how we can make it more fair.”
Fair to whom? It may seem like a good idea to people in the Willowvale Fire District, but what about the rest of the town? Why should taxpayers in other districts be required to pay more fire tax just because Willowvale taxpayers want to pay less?

Councilman Backman, represents all of Ward 1, not just those in the Willowvale Fire District, although he lives in the Willowvale Fire District. Would Councilman Backman be considering redistricting if the costs were the other way around?

Perhaps a better way to handle the costs associated with the Willowvale Fire Company is to take a look at revenues and expenses to see where cuts might be made much like a business does when their costs keep rising.

For instance, General Municipal Law § 209-z became effective on August 1, 2007, and, applies to covered fire companies starting with fiscal years ending on and after August 1, 2007. That law states, in part:
1. Notwithstanding any provision of general or special law to the contrary, any fire company with revenues of two hundred thousand dollars, or such lesser amount as the state comptroller shall designate, that contracts with a city, town, village or fire district to provide fire service shall obtain an annual audit of its records by an independent certified public accountant or an independent public accountant. Such audit shall be an examination of the revenues and expenditures in connection with such contract or contracts.
Looking at the 2010 budget for the Willowvale Fire District, the amount raised by tax was $391,388. Guess General Municipal Law § 209-z applies to the Willowvale Fire Company.

Are they in compliance? Has the Willowvale Fire Company been hiring an independent public accountant to audit their books?

General Municipal Law § 209-z also says:
2. A copy of the audit report in the form prescribed by the state comptroller and certified by the accountant shall be furnished to the entity, and the municipal corporation with which the entity contracts, within one hundred eighty days following the end of the fiscal year audited.
By now the Town Clerk should at least have a copies of their audits for 2008 and 2009 which means that they would be available from the Town Clerk under the FOI Law. A FOIL request has been sent to the Town Clerk.

Then there is General Municipal Law § 204-a.

According to NYS Comptroller Opinion 2007-8 :
General Municipal Law § 204-a provides that a fire company, before engaging in fund raising activities, must notify the governing board of the political subdivision having general control of that company of the proposed activity. The governing board of the political subdivision may prohibit the fire company from engaging in fund raising activities or in any general or specific type of fund raising activity (General Municipal Law § 204-a [6] [a]). We have expressed the view that, instead of totally prohibiting fund raising activities, the governing board of the political subdivision may place reasonable restrictions on such activities, which may include a requirement for the submission of a financial report on the receipts and expenditures of the proceeds of such activities, and submission of related books and records of the fire company for audit (Opn No. 88-55, supra ).
Hmm...we don't remember Willowvale Fire Company ever notifying the town board of any fundraising they plan to do. Interesting though...requiring the submission of a financial report on the receipts and expenditures of the proceeds of their fundraising activities. Perhaps this needs to be further researched to determine if Willowvale Fire Company should be reporting their fundraising activities to the town board.

In an April 13, 2010 Observer Dispatch article, Willowvale fire costs highest in New Hartford, Supervisor Tyksinksi said:
...he had heard several complaints from residents of the Willowvale fire district about the costs.
Let's keep in mind that Willowvale fire rates are higher than other town rates because of the cost of building a new firehouse and the cost of the pension benefit plan. Willowvale fire district residents had a chance to vote on each of these issues; the rest of the town did not have a vote!

Both issues were discussed at numerous town board meetings; there were public hearings on each; there were newspaper articles and we blogged about the retirement benefit. How many of the "complainers" sat at home and never bothered to go to the polls?

The point of this blog is not to say that we necessarily believe there are problems with the way the Willowvale Fire Company is managing their money. However, there does need to be some accountability and perhaps some cost-cutting on the part of the fire company. The laws allowing for accountability are in place; the town board needs to make sure that the laws are followed. An extra set of eyes might be able to find cost-cutting measures that might help to reduce the budget, thus reducing the fire tax.

One last note, although the residents in the Willowvale Fire Company are obligated to pay for the new building, the retirement incentive plan can be reversed by the collection of signatures presented to the town board to force it to a vote. Perhaps if the residents in that district are so upset with their fire tax, someone might actually decide to collect those signatures instead of complaining.

There are other recent laws that have been passed in relation to fire districts and companies; you can read some of them on the State Comptroller's website.

Monday, June 7, 2010

Piece of pie anyone?


Above pie chart created using 2009 revenues as reported by the Library Board of Trustees in their 2009 Annual Report For Public And Association Libraries. [Click on graphic to view in larger print.]


At the May 26, 2010 town board meeting, the town board unanimously appointed Mr. Wiatr to the New Hartford Public Library Board of Trustees. Since then, Mr. Wiatr has made several attempts to communicate with the "unofficial trustees", but to date his efforts have fallen on deaf ears. Perhaps it's time to point out a few facts...


Fact #1:

NYS Education Law §260 clearly states that only a town board may appoint members to a public library board of trustees. However, for the past five (5) years, the New Hartford Public Library has been making their own appointments. As reported in the Observer Dispatch, New Hartford library isn’t following its bylaws, the only officially appointed Library Trustee is Edmund J. Wiatr, Jr.

Fact #2:

Public Officer's Law §10 mandates that public officials must take the Oath of Office. It also states that the official shall file their Oath in the office of the clerk of the county in which he shall reside, if no place be otherwise provided by law for the filing thereof. That's where Town Law §25 comes into play. This law specifies that a trustee or officer of a town may file the oath of office with the town clerk.

Fact #3:

Town law §25 also states:
A neglect or an omission to take and file such oath, or to execute and file such undertaking within the time prescribed herein, except in the case of town justices, shall be deemed a refusal to serve and the office may be filled as in case of vacancy.
The time prescribed by Town Law §25 and Public Officer's Law §30(1)(h) is "if an appointive office, within thirty days after notice of his appointment, or within thirty days after the commencement of such term".

We checked with Town Clerk Gail Wolanin Young; she has not administered the Oath of Office to any current Library Trustees [except for Mr. Wiatr]; therefore, it would appear that the town board now has up to 10 vacancies to fill.

Getting back to the above pie chart, it is plain to see that 79% of the revenue to run the Library in 2009 came directly from the levy of taxes on Town of New Hartford residents with an additional 9% derived from the levy of taxes on all Oneida County residents. Only 12% of their revenues came from fundraising, gifts and other.

That being said, it would behoove the Library trustees to rethink their position on the appointment of ordinary taxpayers to their "elite" Board of Trustees. The Library needs broad public support to survive...the old adage "don't bite the hand that feeds you" applies here. How do you tell residents that their money is welcome, but they are not; where's your manners?

Current "unofficial" trustees as identified on the New Hartford Public Library website are:
Mary Du Ross, President
Shell Storrier, Vice-President
James Kirkpatrick, Secretary
Earl R. Cunningham, Treasurer
Susan M. Blatt, MD
Kevin Kelly
Alfred Moretz, MD
Linda Romano Petralia
Peter Rayhill
Connie P. Stephens
All upstanding members of the community and certainly people who should know the art of working with others; even those "others" that they would not normally even consider socializing with.

Since it is very obvious that the Library needs to get a piece of the "tax dollar pie" to survive, perhaps they should first consider eating a piece of "humble pie".

There is a lot of work to do to correct the oversights of the past...Mr. Wiatr, the only "officially appointed" library trustee, made an effort to reach across the table; how the rest of the story plays out is up to the "unofficial" library trustees.

Strikeslip has more on the New Hartford Library situation...Same Old Same Old In New Hartford.

Friday, June 4, 2010

They actually knew all along...

Concerned Citizens has learned through FOILed emails that during the Earle Reed administration the entire town board was well aware that their budgeted sales tax revenues were way off base.

A memo written by Town Bookkeeper Carol Fairbrother was dated August 22, 2008; about the same time that the budget committee [Fairbrother, Reed, Basile, et al] would have been working on the 2009 town budget. The memo included an Excel spreadsheet summary report for budgeted vs. actual sales tax revenue received from 2001 to 2008.

The spreadsheet that was prepared by the town bookkeeper shows a deficit of actual sales tax revenue vs budget of $144,258.54 in 2007 and $482,537.32 deficit in 2008.

Even though the town had already hired a financial consultant in 2007 who was, according to his billing, being paid $150 an hour to oversee the budget process and even though the town is audited every year by an outside firm; there appear to have been no "red flags" after this report was received in August 2008. Instead, the 2009 budget was adopted to include the same sales tax revenue projection for 2009 as was budgeted for 2008...$5,500,000.

The deficits in sales tax revenue for 2007, 2008 and eventually 2009 probably had to be taken out of the "rainy day" fund in order to balance the budget each year.

There can be no excuses made for the fiscal irresponsibility shown during the last administration. They all were sent this memo by the town bookkeeper! This was an intentional cover-up of the increase in spending during the Earle Reed administration and one can only surmise that it was done to "keep the natives from getting restless" until after the deal/borrowing for the business park was complete.

It also calls to question why the bookkeeper did not blow the whistle; she was part of the budget committee putting together the 2009 budget. Did the $71,000+ overtime payment have anything to do with it?

What other tidbits of information will be uncovered in the coming weeks as FOILed emails start rolling in???

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Congratulations and Thank You for Stepping Up to the Plate...


At the May 26, 2010 town board meeting, Edmund J. Wiatr Jr., Co-Founder of Concerned Citizens was unanimously approved by the New Hartford Town Board for a five-year appointment to the New Hartford Library Board of Trustees.

An earlier Observer Dispatch article [also see our blog, New Hartford Public Library] reported that between 2006-2010, none of the trustees were appointed by the New Hartford Town Board as required by the New Hartford Public Library By-Laws.

The portion of the May 26th town board meeting with the appointment of Mr. Wiatr excerpt can be viewed below:



Town Supervisor Patrick Tyksinski has said that the town board will be replacing 3 trustees this year, Ed being the first appointment; the board is currently looking for 2 more people for appointment to the Library Board of Trustees. Anyone interested should submit a letter of interest along with their resume to the New Hartford Town Clerk.

According to the Observer Dispatch article in today's paper, Citizens’ group leader named to library board, Ms. DuRoss was quoted as saying:
She also said she was aware that Wiatr had dropped his contact information off at the library, but had not reached out to him yet.

“He’ll be notified when the next meeting is,” she said. “That’s public information.”
Well, meeting times and dates are NOT quite public information at this point...but we foresee some changes in the very near future. Currently, the Library website says:
The regularly scheduled meeting of the Board is the third Wednesday of each month. The Board meetings are held at Butler Memorial hall, 48 Genesee Street, New Hartford, and begin at 7 pm. Please contact the Library Director (733-1535) to confirm the time and place of the next meeting.
Hmm...that is so against the Open Meetings Law. People should not have to contact the Library to confirm when the meetings are held. The Library needs to make use of their website and contact the Observer Dispatch to openly advertise their meeting times and places.

The Observer Dispatch article goes on to say:
She [Ms. DuRoss] declined to comment about whether the library normally contacted its new board members, and also declined to comment about whether she would accept Wiatr as a board member.
Ms. DuRoss, quite frankly your attitude stinks. Mr. Wiatr was appointed by the town board, the only ones who have the authority to appoint members to the Library Board of Trustees! Whether you want to "accept" him or not...Ed will be in attendance and sitting at the table of your next board meeting.

According to the Handbook for Library Trustees found on the State Education Department website:
Library trustees play a special, keenly important role in shepherding the dedicated and prudent use of library resources. Always striving to provide the best service which benefits and supports the entire community, trustees must make policy, personnel and fiscal decisions crucial to a positive direction for the library. While delegating the day-to-day activities to competent staff, the library trustees must always be mindful of how their decisions impact the lives of people and the future of their community.
Library trustees are responsible to the library and to the public it serves. Trustees must fulfill the duties commonly referred to as “care, loyalty, and obedience” and must be tireless advocates for improving library services...
Ms. DuRoss, nothing further need be said...besides, you have already embarrassed yourself enough in today's paper. It's time to move on.

Once again, Ed, thank you on behalf of all taxpayers in New Hartford. We know that you will bring a much needed breath of fresh air to the New Hartford Public Library Board of Trustees.